Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2016 13:12:22 GMT -5
I think we are going to have a hard time scoring this week. The only chance we have is if Eddie Lacy can have a big day. The Vikes defense is for real. I'll probably say this a lot this year, but this game could go either way. I think the Packers find a way to win a low scoring very close game. Our defense is going to have to play well.
Packers 20
Vikes 17
|
|
|
|
Post by happypacker on Sept 14, 2016 12:55:19 GMT -5
The Stage is set for the Vikings to beat the packers in there new stadium. Only thing that is going to stop them is the fact that either QB they have will not be able to pass well enough to beat the Packers. I think Hill should start, he knows the plays and his players better than Bradford, so he gives them the best shot, But, he must have a hot hand to beat the packers, I think not. Our defense is going to play well enough to stifle his pass game. If Bradford starts, he just has not had enough time to be very effective yet. So that leaves it up to A Peterson,,, and the Packers seem to keep him out of the endzone and with fewer clutch big plays, so the Packers will win this one. I think!
Packers---30
Vikings---16
|
|
|
|
Post by TW on Sept 14, 2016 18:45:53 GMT -5
I understand the optimism, but in all honesty, I think we fall victim to the noise.
Vikings 24 Packers 21
It's a 2 INT day for Rodgers.
|
|
|
|
Post by nick20 on Sept 18, 2016 12:43:08 GMT -5
packers 30. vikes 21. Rodgers out plays hill and the D does just enough.
|
|
|
|
Post by happypacker on Sept 18, 2016 16:24:09 GMT -5
I think Bradford is getting the start? same results though if he does. Packers should be the winners if the stadium Nosie does not hinder the Packers players.
|
|
|
|
Post by TW on Sept 18, 2016 18:58:48 GMT -5
Yup! That's what I just saw, in pre-game.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2016 5:45:13 GMT -5
Out-coached
Out-played
Zimmer knows how to beat the Packers. They are the better team. Period.
|
|
|
|
Post by TW on Sept 19, 2016 7:38:28 GMT -5
I agree. They are the better team because of how the coaching staff utilizes the players they have. Talent wise? The Packers are probably better.
I'm afraid Rodgers is losing self-confidence. The more it erodes, the less this team will do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2016 10:38:50 GMT -5
Rodgers looks rattled. He looked awful yesterday. It doesn't help that our coaching staff doesn't think pre-season in important and we are totally out of sync. Why is it we rarely see anyone wide open. Most of his completions he has a very tight window to put the ball. It's like that every week. Something dead wrong with the scheme in my opinion.
We are wasting Rodgers chances of winning another championship. Same story every single year. I'm also tired of watching or defense give up the big play. Bradford looked all world and Rodgers looked like a deer in the headlights.
I'm tired of watching the same crap over and over. That wasn't even fun to watch last night. We were lucky it was even close. Should have been a blowout.
|
|
|
|
Post by TW on Sept 19, 2016 11:10:13 GMT -5
It's not going to change until it's too late. The Rodgers era is three years from over. We'll see Rodgers, Nelson, and Matthews all hitting the road at about the same time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2016 12:55:12 GMT -5
TJ Lang called out Rodgers after the game and said he holds the ball too long. I think Rodgers is frustrated with MM and the play calling. His demeanor is awful and often takes it out on his line. I think they're sick of it. Things are broken in GB and I'm not saying that because of one loss. I read something online today that Rodgers has not had a QB rating over 100 in 14 games. An entire offseason to study the Vikings defense and this was the best game plan we could come up with? What a waste.
|
|
