|
|
Post by TW on Oct 26, 2015 9:27:29 GMT -5
This is going to be a tough game, since it's in Denver. The Broncos home crowd can be as powerful a 12th man as the fans in Seattle. The Packers are going to be spending most of the day playing with hand signals, and silent counts, unless they can build up a solid lead, and take the fans out of it.
I hate to do this, because I think it's a toss-up game, but I'm going with the Packers 27-24, "if" the Packers avoid turnovers. That could make the difference in the game. Two or more turnovers and this score will be reversed.
|
|
|
|
Post by happypacker on Oct 26, 2015 12:53:07 GMT -5
Manning is old nd done, BUT, our defense is the worst what Manning does best. Hit the short to middle passes with the TE's getting a lot of work. If e packers gewt back Montgomery and give Janis playg time they will win this game. If not look to see Manning marching down the field all day long.
I pick the Packers to sack Manning 5 times and get thee ints. and the score is Packers 27. Broncos, 13.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2015 9:02:52 GMT -5
I really hope I'm wrong but I think we lose this one on the road. I don't think Denver is as good as all the hype but neither are we. Hopefully getting healthy will help us down the stretch.
I'm going with Denver 24-17
|
|
|
|
Post by happypacker on Oct 27, 2015 14:33:09 GMT -5
I think we beat the broncos, but traveling again to Panthers country is where is just might have jet lag and coming off a mile high battle this is the game we could lose against the panthers. I just feel that manning has little remaining and we should generate enough pressure to get him sacked a few times and force a couple turnovers. It looks like it will be ADams coming back before Montgomery from what i heard. I will wait until Wednesday to see the injury report.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnpackfan7 on Oct 28, 2015 19:23:28 GMT -5
So many hard things to evaluate. How many actually good teams in the NFL are there?
GB's schedule has not exactly been murderers row of offenses...which may lead to our defensive ranking in points against.
Denvers may have been even easier...
While I think Denver's defense may be better as a whole...I do think its close...and if one will be slightly exposed...Id take my chances on Rodgers vs. Manning at this point in time.
Rodgers pulls off a close one.
|
|
|
|
Post by happypacker on Oct 29, 2015 5:27:46 GMT -5
remember that even a healthy ankle with Lacy will noy help his run game as much in Mile high. He has lung problems that will be enhanced by the thinner O2 level. Starks will need to carry the load. Maybe they bring up Harris? he is a banger like Lacy.
|
|
|
|
Post by TW on Oct 29, 2015 13:45:39 GMT -5
We're without #44 this week. Hip injury. I think that's a bad situation. If Lacy tweaks that ankle, we're a one dimensional team. I hope the game plan considers that, and allows for a subtle switch to a passing game if necessary.
I agree on the statement that there's a lot of unbeaten teams out here. It surprises me to be honest. I also agree that we've been playing teams that haven't been able to expose our defensive weaknesses all that well "yet." Despite the 500 yards that Rivers threw against us, we got lucky in the red zone. Can Manning pick us apart? I don't know. Can we expose the Denver defensive weaknesses? I don't know.
What I do know is that it will be a very tough game.
|
|
|
|
Post by happypacker on Oct 30, 2015 5:05:15 GMT -5
Starks practiced in limited time thurs. He looks like both Starks and lacy will play.
Abbs is going to return kick offs. Montgomery i think will sit again this week. Burnett is going to play, Perry is a if, and Randell did not practice thurs. but it was not due to injury. I still think we beat the Broncos. Lets hope that Rodgers is more accurate this week. Looks like it will be Cobb, J Jones, as one two and then Adams, Janis, Abbs. need a big game from R. Rodgers to. masthey needs to have a career game.
|
|
|
|
Post by TW on Oct 30, 2015 9:30:44 GMT -5
Rodgers is beginning to trust Janis a bit more. That's important.
|
|
|
|
Post by happypacker on Nov 2, 2015 8:31:29 GMT -5
I have not seen the whole game a second time yet, but i did not see Janis in the game a t all.
I figured they would not run the ball well.Starks played well only thing is his line blocking stunk.Randall played then we lose Shields and Rollins. Hyde is over hyped and Hayward is not playing the right position he gets beat almost all the time, Most importantly, what I saw was Rodgers not taking any chances, tossing the ball with little accuracy and he had goo goo eyes, I would not have kept playing and getting beaten this badly without at least making some changes. Use Janis, for one. Maybe even toss Tolzien in and let Rodgers rest. just keep doing the same thing over and over with not making a different look or player change. Lots of time if a talent is on the bench and used little if he gets a start and plays they have great days because they are good and the other team has little knowledge of how the play they could be a spark sometimes.
|
|
|
|
Post by TW on Nov 2, 2015 19:02:15 GMT -5
Absolute disaster. Nothing can be said that can account for what happened.
|
|
