Hegelian Dialectic

[townhalleditor]

What is it:

"Hegel's dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels' grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship of the proletariat. The synthetic Hegelian solution to all these conflicts can't be introduced unless we all take a side that will advance the agenda. The Marxist's global agenda is moving along at breakneck speed. The only way to completely stop the privacy invasions, expanding domestic police powers, land grabs, insane wars against inanimate objects (and transient verbs), covert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, is to step outside the dialectic. This releases us from the limitations of controlled and guided thought.

Today the dialectic is active in every political issue that encourages taking sides. We can see it in environmentalists instigating conflicts against private property owners, in democrats against republicans, in greens against libertarians, in communists against socialists, in neo-cons against traditional conservatives, in community activists against individuals, in pro-choice versus pro-life, in Christians against Muslims, in isolationists versus interventionists, in peace activists against war hawks. No matter what the issue, the invisible dialectic aims to control both the conflict and the resolution of differences, and leads everyone involved into a new cycle of conflicts."

The Hegelian dialectical formula: A (thesis) versus B (anti-thesis) equals C (synthesis).

For example: If (A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of freedom then (C) neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a slave.

Thoughts?

[townhalleditor]

I see no one has responded to this thread and I find that disappointing.

I am not an expert on the theory etc, but it makes perfect sense to me in this media driven world.

I think the founding Fathers had it right to set this nation up as a Republic so that mob rule would not water down the principles of the founding.

With that said, those who are Democrats and those who are Republican are actually the source of the decay of this country's founding values.

When you have one side advocating against drug use, and one side saying the government can't interfere in what one puts into their body, what is the compromise?

I would remind many that the Supreme Court did not start regulating what people did with their bodies etc until the 1920's.

From there, we have had a creep on civil liberties ever since.

Look at any conflict. What are the opposing sides and what is the compromise?

I am not saying that compromise isn't needed in this nation, but look how much this country has changed since the advent of the 24 hour media who constantly feed us with conflict of left vs right with CNN vs Fox and how have values been eroded from parental rights to civil liberties because of the stories the media presents and knee jerk, dull witted politicians act upon.

It's quite scary when you take a serious look at where we have been as a nation to where we are going.

[TW]

Looser underwear would help. Try Walmart, or K-mart. ;D